Skip to Main Content
Careers
Diversity
Contact Us
LinkedIn
Twitter
Facebook
Toggle navigation
Professionals
Practices
Industries
News & Insights
About Us
search
Toggle Search
Search Site
Find
Search by Last Name
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z
All
Search Site
Find
Search Site
Find
Filter by
Practices
Admiralty
(24)
Appellate Litigation
(16)
Asbestos Exposure Litigation
(19)
Aviation Litigation
(5)
Banking Law
(1)
Business & Commercial Transactions
(10)
Chemical Exposure Litigation
(12)
Civil Litigation
(2)
Commercial Litigation
(32)
Commercial Real Estate, Finance and Leasing
(6)
Commercial Transportation
(35)
Construction Law & Litigation
(32)
Design Professional Errors and Omissions
(14)
Directors and Officers Liability
(13)
Education Law
(4)
Energy
(11)
Franchising & Distribution
(4)
Health Care Litigation
(11)
Insurance Coverage
(37)
Intellectual Property
(6)
Labor & Employment
(20)
Manufacturer's Liability and Products Liability
(41)
Occupational Exposure Litigation
(10)
Premises Liability
(27)
Professional Liability of Attorneys, Accountants, Agents & Brokers
(30)
Trusts & Estates
(2)
Industries
Aviation
(3)
Banking
(12)
Commercial Real Estate
(6)
Construction
(30)
Energy
(12)
Healthcare
(16)
Insurance
(52)
Manufacturing
(32)
Maritime
(21)
Retail and Restaurant
(15)
Shipbuilding
(4)
Transportation
(29)
Home
Professionals
Successes
Professional Successes
Commercial Transportation - Crayton v. Campbell, et al
In 2015, Mr. Glas served as lead trial counsel in the personal-injury action entitled
Crayton v. Campbell, et al,
No. 704421, 24th JDC, Parish of Jefferson, LA. Mr. Glas parachuted into the case only one month prior to trial, and the court had already ruled that the driver and the trucking company's insurer were 100% liable for rear-ending the plaintiff's van. Before trial, Plaintiff demanded the $1 million policy
limited
be paid to the plaintiff who underwent an L4-5
transforaminal
lumbar interbody fusion, and subsequently received a neurosurgical recommendation for a three-level cervical discectomy and fusion. During closing argument in the damages-only trial, Plaintiff asked for $723,000; and the jury voted 9-3 to award only $323,000 (despite $221,000 in past medical bills), with one juror voting to award $0 to the
plaintiff
.